<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cal-gone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rootsandgrubs.com/2009/01/13/cal-gone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rootsandgrubs.com/2009/01/13/cal-gone/</link>
	<description>Dada, bring my beer in the living room</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:22:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mamster</title>
		<link>http://www.rootsandgrubs.com/2009/01/13/cal-gone/comment-page-1/#comment-37263</link>
		<dc:creator>mamster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 04:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rootsandgrubs.com/2009/01/13/cal-gone/#comment-37263</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m going to give caleb the last word and close comments, because I&#039;m having too much fun researching this, when I should be doing actual work, including finishing a long overdue post about fondue night. (If you prefer to think of it as &quot;mamster can&#039;t handle the truth,&quot; that&#039;s fine too.)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to give caleb the last word and close comments, because I&#8217;m having too much fun researching this, when I should be doing actual work, including finishing a long overdue post about fondue night. (If you prefer to think of it as &#8220;mamster can&#8217;t handle the truth,&#8221; that&#8217;s fine too.)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caleb</title>
		<link>http://www.rootsandgrubs.com/2009/01/13/cal-gone/comment-page-1/#comment-37262</link>
		<dc:creator>caleb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 03:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rootsandgrubs.com/2009/01/13/cal-gone/#comment-37262</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m noticing that you don&#039;t put the word &#039;epidemic&#039; in your post at all. Remember, fat people are more than jolly - we are at higher risk for heart disease, diabetes, sleep apnea, cancer, you know the drill - and the problem is out of control.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think it&#039;s a good idea to base public policy on the available science (that too many calories cause obesity, that too many people have this problem, and that it is killing us) than on our gut feeling about there being more to the story.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Pun intended. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Good reading at http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/obesity/contributing_factors.htm&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m noticing that you don&#8217;t put the word &#8216;epidemic&#8217; in your post at all. Remember, fat people are more than jolly - we are at higher risk for heart disease, diabetes, sleep apnea, cancer, you know the drill - and the problem is out of control.</p>

<p>I think it&#8217;s a good idea to base public policy on the available science (that too many calories cause obesity, that too many people have this problem, and that it is killing us) than on our gut feeling about there being more to the story.</p>

<p>Pun intended. </p>

<p>Good reading at <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/obesity/contributing_factors.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/obesity/contributing_factors.htm</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy</title>
		<link>http://www.rootsandgrubs.com/2009/01/13/cal-gone/comment-page-1/#comment-37253</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 07:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rootsandgrubs.com/2009/01/13/cal-gone/#comment-37253</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;And actually, your link to Subway&#039;s menu (http://www.flickr.com/photos/adonisphotos/3174794195/in/set-72157612211266329/) hits it.  A Subway diner who likes the prime rib as much as the chicken and bacon ranch eats 180 or 360 fewer calories and the meal is still &quot;delicious... and served with affection.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And actually, your link to Subway&#8217;s menu (<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/adonisphotos/3174794195/in/set-72157612211266329/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/adonisphotos/3174794195/in/set-72157612211266329/</a>) hits it.  A Subway diner who likes the prime rib as much as the chicken and bacon ranch eats 180 or 360 fewer calories and the meal is still &#8220;delicious&#8230; and served with affection.&#8221;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy</title>
		<link>http://www.rootsandgrubs.com/2009/01/13/cal-gone/comment-page-1/#comment-37252</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 07:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rootsandgrubs.com/2009/01/13/cal-gone/#comment-37252</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Matthew, for every person who eats when they&#039;re hungry, I think there&#039;s one for whom food and eating is a pleasure mostly or almost entirely disconnected from hunger (at least in the US).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The first category includes you (and I feel fortunate to say, me, so take this comment with a grain of salt).  The second category includes folks we&#039;ve all seen regularly and knowingly put down way more than is required to be full, and the stereotypical example of an obese person ordering a mocha after lunch.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t know where they fall in your hypothesis.  My guess is they&#039;re more likely to find something that&#039;s 40% the calories, 80% as good, and still involves eating or drinking something (latte vs. mocha, rice vs. salad, slice of pumpkin bread vs. half a slice of it).  A ton of calories are elective, so it&#039;s hard not to see that adding up.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Also, your #3 inaccurately implies that the lower calorie item is less filling, and for that reason, I don&#039;t think is very common.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But my guesses may be way off.  My point is that your and my (and probably most R&amp;G readers&#039;) interactions with food are different than about half the population, and in ways that aren&#039;t changing anytime soon.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matthew, for every person who eats when they&#8217;re hungry, I think there&#8217;s one for whom food and eating is a pleasure mostly or almost entirely disconnected from hunger (at least in the US).</p>

<p>The first category includes you (and I feel fortunate to say, me, so take this comment with a grain of salt).  The second category includes folks we&#8217;ve all seen regularly and knowingly put down way more than is required to be full, and the stereotypical example of an obese person ordering a mocha after lunch.</p>

<p>I don&#8217;t know where they fall in your hypothesis.  My guess is they&#8217;re more likely to find something that&#8217;s 40% the calories, 80% as good, and still involves eating or drinking something (latte vs. mocha, rice vs. salad, slice of pumpkin bread vs. half a slice of it).  A ton of calories are elective, so it&#8217;s hard not to see that adding up.</p>

<p>Also, your #3 inaccurately implies that the lower calorie item is less filling, and for that reason, I don&#8217;t think is very common.</p>

<p>But my guesses may be way off.  My point is that your and my (and probably most R&amp;G readers&#8217;) interactions with food are different than about half the population, and in ways that aren&#8217;t changing anytime soon.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.rootsandgrubs.com/2009/01/13/cal-gone/comment-page-1/#comment-37233</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 03:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rootsandgrubs.com/2009/01/13/cal-gone/#comment-37233</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m with Mamster on this one. Calories on menus are like warnings on cigarette packs and &quot;Abstinence-only&quot; sex ed: by and large, they don&#039;t cause people to make healthier lifestyle choices, they just make sure that you make your unhealthy choice while feeling a great deal of guilt. Which, of course, will make you feel sad, which is easily fixed by overeating, smoking, and having unprotected sex.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;(That said, it would be totally awesome if we could somehow have a system that put a little asterisk next to menu items whose calorie (or, more importantly for me personally, carbohydrate) count is much higher than you&#039;d think. Seriously, 900 calories for a latte? Really?)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Mamster on this one. Calories on menus are like warnings on cigarette packs and &#8220;Abstinence-only&#8221; sex ed: by and large, they don&#8217;t cause people to make healthier lifestyle choices, they just make sure that you make your unhealthy choice while feeling a great deal of guilt. Which, of course, will make you feel sad, which is easily fixed by overeating, smoking, and having unprotected sex.</p>

<p>(That said, it would be totally awesome if we could somehow have a system that put a little asterisk next to menu items whose calorie (or, more importantly for me personally, carbohydrate) count is much higher than you&#8217;d think. Seriously, 900 calories for a latte? Really?)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: O.C.</title>
		<link>http://www.rootsandgrubs.com/2009/01/13/cal-gone/comment-page-1/#comment-37232</link>
		<dc:creator>O.C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 03:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rootsandgrubs.com/2009/01/13/cal-gone/#comment-37232</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Mamster, your position in this discussion is wonderfully refreshing, coming as it does from a food writer rather than a &quot;health at any size&quot; activist.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You&#039;re dead on about the research. And nothing that you&#039;re saying contradicts the fact that yes, people can lose some weight by cutting back on calories.  But, unless they are naturally thin, it takes great and increasing effort to keep it off.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You can&#039;t make a naturally thin person fat.  You can&#039;t make a naturally fat person thin.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A dietician&#039;s take on this:  http://junkfoodscience.blogspot.com/&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And an entertaining group of cursing Chicagoans&#039;:  http://kateharding.net&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mamster, your position in this discussion is wonderfully refreshing, coming as it does from a food writer rather than a &#8220;health at any size&#8221; activist.  </p>

<p>You&#8217;re dead on about the research. And nothing that you&#8217;re saying contradicts the fact that yes, people can lose some weight by cutting back on calories.  But, unless they are naturally thin, it takes great and increasing effort to keep it off.  </p>

<p>You can&#8217;t make a naturally thin person fat.  You can&#8217;t make a naturally fat person thin.</p>

<p>A dietician&#8217;s take on this:  <a href="http://junkfoodscience.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://junkfoodscience.blogspot.com/</a></p>

<p>And an entertaining group of cursing Chicagoans&#8217;:  <a href="http://kateharding.net" rel="nofollow">http://kateharding.net</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mamster</title>
		<link>http://www.rootsandgrubs.com/2009/01/13/cal-gone/comment-page-1/#comment-37199</link>
		<dc:creator>mamster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 02:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rootsandgrubs.com/2009/01/13/cal-gone/#comment-37199</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;In case anyone is wondering, Wendy is my sister and we do not hate each other.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case anyone is wondering, Wendy is my sister and we do not hate each other.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy</title>
		<link>http://www.rootsandgrubs.com/2009/01/13/cal-gone/comment-page-1/#comment-37198</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 01:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rootsandgrubs.com/2009/01/13/cal-gone/#comment-37198</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;(My last sentence originally read &quot;do you think it&#039;s impossible, or are you just waiting for better science, so you answered even my unspoken question.)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(My last sentence originally read &#8220;do you think it&#8217;s impossible, or are you just waiting for better science, so you answered even my unspoken question.)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mamster</title>
		<link>http://www.rootsandgrubs.com/2009/01/13/cal-gone/comment-page-1/#comment-37197</link>
		<dc:creator>mamster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 00:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rootsandgrubs.com/2009/01/13/cal-gone/#comment-37197</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You probably know better than I do what the stats are for long-term weight loss, but I would be surprised if the success rate over five years was better than 5 percent. (It depends how you measure, of course.) &quot;Impossible&quot; is a strong word, but those are pretty terrible odds.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;When I say people get fat the way tall people get tall, perhaps a better comparison would be with a condition like pituitary gigantism. It might be possible to treat pituitary gigantism by putting the patient on a low-calorie diet. Without sufficient calories, you just can&#039;t grow that tall. And people with pituitary gigantism eat a lot.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But a better solution is to cut out the tumor causing the gigantism. That doesn&#039;t mean I think obesity is caused by tumors. I don&#039;t. But I don&#039;t think it&#039;s caused by eating too much food, either.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;We don&#039;t know the etiology of obesity.&lt;/em&gt; I wish everyone in health care would say that over and over.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As for &quot;willpower,&quot; that makes me want to equate obesity with depression. Some people apparently overcome depression through nothing more than willpower. Prescribing willpower and positive thinking to a patient presenting depression, however, would be malpractice.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You said yourself that some people have a tendency to gain weight and some don&#039;t. Shouldn&#039;t we be trying to figure out what the difference between these populations is? Of course, this has been investigated already to some extent. Some things we do know: obese people don&#039;t have poorer impulse control than thin people; they don&#039;t have different psychological profiles than thin people on the whole; they do tend to have different populations of gut bacteria (whether this is a cause or effect is unknown).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You know, I think I get now why this bugs me so much. We have a real medical mystery here: a serious condition that affects millions of people and is on the rise. Instead of trying to figure out what&#039;s causing the problem, though, we want to jump right ahead to the conclusion. That&#039;s a shameful lack of curiosity.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the conversation.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You probably know better than I do what the stats are for long-term weight loss, but I would be surprised if the success rate over five years was better than 5 percent. (It depends how you measure, of course.) &#8220;Impossible&#8221; is a strong word, but those are pretty terrible odds.</p>

<p>When I say people get fat the way tall people get tall, perhaps a better comparison would be with a condition like pituitary gigantism. It might be possible to treat pituitary gigantism by putting the patient on a low-calorie diet. Without sufficient calories, you just can&#8217;t grow that tall. And people with pituitary gigantism eat a lot.</p>

<p>But a better solution is to cut out the tumor causing the gigantism. That doesn&#8217;t mean I think obesity is caused by tumors. I don&#8217;t. But I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s caused by eating too much food, either.</p>

<p><em>We don&#8217;t know the etiology of obesity.</em> I wish everyone in health care would say that over and over.</p>

<p>As for &#8220;willpower,&#8221; that makes me want to equate obesity with depression. Some people apparently overcome depression through nothing more than willpower. Prescribing willpower and positive thinking to a patient presenting depression, however, would be malpractice.</p>

<p>You said yourself that some people have a tendency to gain weight and some don&#8217;t. Shouldn&#8217;t we be trying to figure out what the difference between these populations is? Of course, this has been investigated already to some extent. Some things we do know: obese people don&#8217;t have poorer impulse control than thin people; they don&#8217;t have different psychological profiles than thin people on the whole; they do tend to have different populations of gut bacteria (whether this is a cause or effect is unknown).</p>

<p>You know, I think I get now why this bugs me so much. We have a real medical mystery here: a serious condition that affects millions of people and is on the rise. Instead of trying to figure out what&#8217;s causing the problem, though, we want to jump right ahead to the conclusion. That&#8217;s a shameful lack of curiosity.</p>

<p>Thanks for the conversation.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy</title>
		<link>http://www.rootsandgrubs.com/2009/01/13/cal-gone/comment-page-1/#comment-37194</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rootsandgrubs.com/2009/01/13/cal-gone/#comment-37194</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;But as you have mentioned, there are definite hormonal/metabolic influences, and my understanding is that it&#039;s easy for the body to compensate for a small change like 100 fewer calories per day.  That doesn&#039;t change the idea behind calories in/calories out, just points out that &quot;calories out&quot; is not always within our control.  The range of calorie consumption that results in &quot;weight maintenance&quot; (rather than loss or gain) is pretty big.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t know that I&#039;d use the term &quot;mindless eating&quot; to describe what I&#039;ve talked about above.  And I recognize that it&#039;s easier for me to talk about habits and willpower than it is for you, because of our personal situations, even though a lot of people would still get upset over what I say.  It was really difficult to get over the idea that I OUGHT to be thin because I eat so much more healthily than--well, pretty much anyone I know.  But even though I carry out part of your tall-people-get-tall thing, since I gained weight in the first place because of thyroid disease, I always do come back to the idea of habits and willpower.  And I think what we (by &quot;we&quot; I mean, I don&#039;t know, healthcare professionals or the media or something) need to talk about more is how hard it is to change habits, and maybe how unfair it is that some people have a tendency to weight gain and others don&#039;t, not &quot;this isn&#039;t about willpower&quot;.  And of course we have to continue avoiding the erroneous idea that overweight people have LESS willpower than thin people, because that isn&#039;t true.  It just takes EXTRA willpower to lose weight, or make any kind of significant change--but perhaps especially weight, because of the oft-pointed-out things about food being a necessity and an important part of culture and a coping mechanism for many people.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But if you think people get fat the same way tall people get tall--isn&#039;t that like saying permanent/significant/purposeful weight loss is impossible?  (Um, I don&#039;t mean that confrontationally, or anything, just genuinely curious.)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But as you have mentioned, there are definite hormonal/metabolic influences, and my understanding is that it&#8217;s easy for the body to compensate for a small change like 100 fewer calories per day.  That doesn&#8217;t change the idea behind calories in/calories out, just points out that &#8220;calories out&#8221; is not always within our control.  The range of calorie consumption that results in &#8220;weight maintenance&#8221; (rather than loss or gain) is pretty big.</p>

<p>I don&#8217;t know that I&#8217;d use the term &#8220;mindless eating&#8221; to describe what I&#8217;ve talked about above.  And I recognize that it&#8217;s easier for me to talk about habits and willpower than it is for you, because of our personal situations, even though a lot of people would still get upset over what I say.  It was really difficult to get over the idea that I OUGHT to be thin because I eat so much more healthily than&#8212;well, pretty much anyone I know.  But even though I carry out part of your tall-people-get-tall thing, since I gained weight in the first place because of thyroid disease, I always do come back to the idea of habits and willpower.  And I think what we (by &#8220;we&#8221; I mean, I don&#8217;t know, healthcare professionals or the media or something) need to talk about more is how hard it is to change habits, and maybe how unfair it is that some people have a tendency to weight gain and others don&#8217;t, not &#8220;this isn&#8217;t about willpower&#8221;.  And of course we have to continue avoiding the erroneous idea that overweight people have LESS willpower than thin people, because that isn&#8217;t true.  It just takes EXTRA willpower to lose weight, or make any kind of significant change&#8212;but perhaps especially weight, because of the oft-pointed-out things about food being a necessity and an important part of culture and a coping mechanism for many people.</p>

<p>But if you think people get fat the same way tall people get tall&#8212;isn&#8217;t that like saying permanent/significant/purposeful weight loss is impossible?  (Um, I don&#8217;t mean that confrontationally, or anything, just genuinely curious.)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
